My Blog
Technology

House lawmakers are investigating how some tech companies will handle health data related to abortions


House Oversight Committee members Reps. Carolyn Maloney, Raja Krishnamoorthi and Sara Jacobs on Thursday night sent letters to five data broker companies and five health-tracking app companies seeking information about their collection, retention and sale of personal health data. The companies have until July 21 to respond, according to the letters, which were viewed by CNN Business.

The move comes amid increasing concerns that personal data, such as location history, health history, messages and searches, could be used by law enforcement in some states to criminalize people seeking or providing abortions, after the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade.
Many tech companies have thus far declined to say how they plan to respond to such requests from law enforcement. And online privacy experts have identified data brokers — which collect consumer data from various online sources and license it to third parties, typically advertisers — as a particularly vulnerable area because law enforcement could potentially purchase user data rather than having to issue a formal legal request.
A big question for tech companies post-Roe: How to respond to law enforcement requests for data?

The companies contacted by lawmakers include data broker firms SafeGraph, Digital Envoy, Pacer.ai, Gravy Analytics and Babel Street, as well as health-tracker app operators Flo Health, Glow, BioWink, GP International and Digitalchemy Ventures. In recent weeks, some period and fertility tracking apps, including Flo, have announced an “anonymous” mode that they say will help protect users.

In the letters, the lawmakers asked data brokers, for example, for information related to their revenues from the sale of location data and a list of purchasers of information related to family planning clinics or abortion services. They also asked the health-tracking apps for “documents and communications concerning the actual or potential production” of personal reproductive or sexual health data, either voluntarily or in response to a legal request, as well as communications about such data with state and local governments.

“The collection of sensitive data could pose serious threats to those seeking reproductive care as well as to providers of such care, not only by facilitating intrusive government surveillance, but also by putting people at risk of harassment, intimidation, and even violence,” the lawmakers wrote.

Congress has been considering new legislation to protect American’s personal health data in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling, and a group of senators last month introduced a bill that would ban data brokers from selling health and location data. “As Congress considers legislative reforms to ensure the privacy of personal reproductive and sexual health information, we are examining the practices of data brokers and other companies regarding the collection, dissemination, and sale of this private data,” Maloney, Krishnamoorthi and Jacobs said in their Thursday letters.

Related posts

Microsoft and Activision Set New Deadline for $69B Deal: What It Means for Gamers

newsconquest

MacBook Professional 2022 Rumors: May just We See an M2 13-inch Model in March?

newsconquest

Packers vs. Broncos Livestream: How to Watch NFL Week 7 Online Today

newsconquest

Leave a Comment