Conservative Republican election lawyer Ben Ginsberg stated there was once “by no means” an example wherein a courtroom discovered that Trump’s marketing campaign’s fraud claims had been credible.
“There was once by no means that example. In the entire the circumstances that had been introduced in — and I checked out greater than 60 that come with greater than 180 counts. And no, the straightforward truth is that the Trump marketing campaign didn’t make its case,” he instructed the committee.
Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California stated the choose committee has known 62 post-election court cases filed via the Trump marketing campaign and his allies between Nov. 4, 2020, and Jan. 6, 2021. Lofgren stated the ones circumstances ended in 61 losses and “just a unmarried victory which in reality did not impact the end result for both candidate.”
Requested what he thinks of the claims that Trump was once now not given a possibility to offer proof they’d voter fraud and whether or not they had their day in courtroom, Ginsberg stated, “They did have their day in courtroom. About part of the ones circumstances that you discussed had been brushed aside at the procedural level for a scarcity of status, the correct other people did not carry the case, or there wasn’t enough proof and it were given brushed aside on a movement to brush aside.”
“However within the different, there have been discussions of the deserves that had been contained within the lawsuits. And in no example did a courtroom in finding that the costs of fraud had been actual. And additionally it is value noting that despite the fact that the Trump marketing campaign complained that it didn’t have its day in courtroom, there were post-election evaluations in every of the six battleground states that can have made a distinction,” he instructed the committee. He went directly to checklist checklist examples, together with the hand recount in Georgia.
“In every a type of circumstances, there was once no credible proof of fraud produced via the Trump marketing campaign or his supporters,” he added.
Extra at the witness: Ginsberg is thought of as a number one Republican knowledgeable on election fraud and performed a vital function within the Florida recount case when then-candidate George W. Bush defeated then-Vice President Al Gore.
Even prior to the election, Ginsberg was once vocal in regards to the weak spot of the previous President’s claims. In a September 2020 essay, Ginsberg criticized the assertions as missing proof and “unsustainable.”
The listening to on Monday morning was once set to concentrate on how Trump wondered the election procedure extensively, understanding their assertions would now not trade the end result, committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney, a Republican of Wyoming, stated remaining week.
She stated the committee will attempt to turn how “Trump engaged in an enormous effort to unfold false and fraudulent data” even if “Trump and his advisors knew that he had, actually, misplaced the election.”
CNN’s Jamie Gangel contributed reporting to this publish.
