My Blog
Politics

Past Nominees Have Been Undone by Far Less

Past Nominees Have Been Undone by Far Less
Past Nominees Have Been Undone by Far Less


New York Times: “The legal and ethical issues surrounding some of President-elect Donald Trump’s selections for top administration jobs, not to mention their history of eyebrow-raising public statements, are far more profound than the kinds of revelations that have killed nominations in the Senate in the past.”

“What once passed as disqualifying for a presidential nominee seems downright benign in comparison to allegations of sexual misconduct and illicit drug use by his attorney general pick detailed in a secret congressional report, a sexual assault accusation followed by a paid settlement for his choice to head the Pentagon and an acknowledged former heroin addiction by the would-be health secretary.”

“It was not so long ago that nominees for high-level jobs and even some of the more obscure ones had to be above reproach, to the point where a relatively minor tax issue could derail them. But times are evidently changing when it comes to nominations at the dawn of the second Trump administration.”

FavoriteLoadingSave to Favorites

Related posts

John Fetterman Is Reportedly Doing Well And On A Path To Recovery

newsconquest

The Number That Will Shape Republican Politics In 2023

newsconquest

Russian oligarch’s luxurious yacht seized in Spain at US’ request

newsconquest