My Blog
Politics

No Labels Has Suddenly Entered Full Meltdown Mode

No Labels Has Suddenly Entered Full Meltdown Mode
No Labels Has Suddenly Entered Full Meltdown Mode


Greg Sargent: “No Labels faces a problem that runs deeper than the lack of high-profile candidates willing to take the third-party plunge: The group’s core argument has proven impossible to sustain, and everyone paying even cursory attention to its activities knows it.”

“For months, as No Labels has sought to secure a line on ballots in as many states as possible—the group claims 16 as of now—its officials have sworn vehemently that they have no intention of mounting a candidacy that only functions as a spoiler or helps Trump. Joe Lieberman, the group’s founding chairman, often says as much. The true intention, it says, is to answer the public’s alleged call for an alternative to the two parties with a ‘unity ticket’ that will birth a new coalition of public-spirited voters who value bipartisan compromise over petty partisanship and dysfunction.”

“But no matter how hard No Labels strains to project such pious intentions, the all-but-certain impact of such a plan has proven impossible to disguise. It is borderline impossible for such a bid to win outright in enough states to assemble a majority of 270 Electoral College votes—Ross Perot and Ralph Nader won none; the last third-party candidate to win any electoral votes was George Wallace, 56 years ago.”

FavoriteLoadingSave to Favorites

Related posts

Rep. Ted Lieu Nails Why Clarence Thomas Accepting Gifts Was Criminal

newsconquest

The Dobbs Divide | FiveThirtyEight

newsconquest

An intensely personal trip to Auschwitz-Birkenau: Reporters’ notebook

newsconquest