NASA plans to use it to land astronauts on the moon, but that might be only the beginning of new opportunities — if it flies
April 16, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. EDT
As early as Monday morning, SpaceX is expected to launch, for the first time, its own massive rocket, an almost 400-foot-tall behemoth known as Starship. Powered by a staggering 33 first-stage engines, it would have nearly twice the thrust of the SLS. And unlike NASA’s SLS, which falls into the ocean after its payload is launched, the stainless steel Starship is designed to return to a soft landing on Earth, to be used again.
The Federal Aviation Administration granted SpaceX a license for the launch on Friday, and SpaceX said it is targeting a two-and-half-hour window beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Monday for the launch, with other opportunities in the following days if a delay is required.
If the SLS represents a traditional government approach to rocket design — one that uses hardware originally designed in the 1970s for the space shuttle — Starship symbolizes space flight’s modern, entrepreneurial bent. Starship is designed to be refueled in orbit, allowing SpaceX to hoist an unprecedented amount of cargo and potentially dozens of people to deep space. And, because it will be reusable, it is expected to be far less expensive to operate than the SLS.
The promise of Starship and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk’s asserting that the vehicle “could make life on Mars real” have attracted legions of fans. For years, they have jammed Musk’s presentations on the rocket, obsessively tracked its design iterations and made pilgrimages to SpaceX’s Starship facility in a remote corner of South Texas the company calls Starbase.
But Starship also has won over NASA, which has placed the rocket at the center of its exploration goals. In 2021, the space agency awarded SpaceX a $2.9 billion contract to use it as the vehicle that would land astronauts on the surface of the moon, giving it a starring role in NASA’s campaign to return people to the lunar surface as part of its Artemis program.
Its launch will be the first time SpaceX has attempted to fly the full vehicle — the Starship spacecraft mounted on top of the Super Heavy booster. A successful launch would be no small feat, especially given the size and complexity of the rocket. “With a test such as this, success is measured by how much we can learn, which will inform and improve the probability of success in the future as SpaceX rapidly advances development of Starship,” SpaceX said in a statement.
Speaking at a Morgan Stanley conference last month, Musk said there is a 50 percent chance the first flight will succeed.
“I’m not saying it will get to orbit, but I am guaranteeing excitement,” he said. “It won’t be boring.”
If it does fly successfully, Starship would serve not only as a vehicle for exploration, but for science as well. With its ability to hoist enormous amounts of mass to orbit, astronomers and astrophysicists see rethinking what sorts of telescopes and instruments can be catapulted into space.
In its fully reusable configuration, Starship would be able to lift more than 100 metric tons — more than 220,000 pounds — to the moon and even more to low Earth orbit, according to a SpaceX user’s guide from 2020.
By contrast, the current version of SLS is capable of hoisting 27 metric tons, or 59,500 pounds, to the moon, according to NASA. With a pending upgrade, that would increase to 38 metric tons or 83,700 pounds.
“Assuming it is successful, Starship will dramatically enhance our space capabilities in ways that will qualitatively alter how astrophysics missions can be built,” predicted an article in Physics Today written by a trio of astronomers and physicists. “… Astrophysics missions to space have always been tightly constrained by the capabilities of the launchers, which have not changed substantially in two decades.”
A report last year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine found that “Starships can accommodate payloads that are significantly larger and heavier than traditional NASA planetary payloads, significantly reducing the need for the costly reductions in size and mass required for traditional NASA payloads.”
“It’s quite simple, really. When you design any missions for astronomy, you’re very limited by the mass available in the rocket,” Martin Elvis, a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard and Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said in an interview. The James Webb Space Telescope, for example, had to be designed to be folded so it could be stuffed into the nose cone of the Ariane 5 rocket that shot it to space. The total mass was nearly 14,000 pounds, far less than what Starship would be able to accommodate.
“Your whole development process, your whole design process, becomes so much simpler,” he said. “And that saves enormous amounts of cost.”
Indeed, Starship’s cargo space is so generous that it may take a while for the space industry to grow into it.
“Starship is too big for most payloads today,” said Carissa Christensen, the CEO of Bryce Space and Technology, a consulting firm. “If it is cheap enough, that might not matter. And it could serve as a direct substitute for less capable vehicles in the near term. The real impact will be new concepts that take advantage of the vehicle’s massive capacity. It will take years for the market to design and manufacture payloads that are truly optimized for Starship.”
Starship already has a few customers. Yusaku Maezawa, a Japanese billionaire, has booked a trip around the moon with several other private citizens. Another billionaire, Jared Isaacman, who commanded an all private-citizen flight to orbit on SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft in 2021, plans to fly on Starship’s first mission with people. It is unclear, however, when either of those flights would occur.
In the near term, SpaceX needs Starship to begin flying regularly so that it can put the next generation of its Starlink internet satellites in orbit. They are more capable than the satellites in the current constellation, which are launched in batches by SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. But the new satellites are much heavier, about 1.25 tons, Musk has said, and would require Starship’s increased power.
But first SpaceX needs to launch successfully.
SpaceX blew up a series of spacecraft prototypes during an earlier testing campaign, flying them about six miles up, then bringing them back down in landing attempts that ended in fiery explosions until the company finally stuck the landing.
Last year, SpaceX won preliminary approval for its first launch from the Federal Aviation Administration, which required it to take many actions designed to protect the surrounding environment and reduce the impact of its activities on a nearby public beach and wildlife preserve before being given a launch license.
The upcoming launch attempt is far more ambitious than the previous tests. Starship will be stacked on top of the 33-engine Super Heavy booster, which is expected to send Starship speeding around much of the globe before falling back into the atmosphere and crashing into the ocean off the coast of Hawaii.
If the launch fails, Musk said SpaceX would try again soon. “We’re building a whole series of Starships in South Texas, and so I think we’ve got hopefully an 80 percent chance of reaching orbit this year.”
For this attempt, SpaceX will not try to land either Starship or its booster. But eventually it hopes that the booster will fly back to its nearly 500-foot-tall launch tower, where it will be caught by a pair of arms that operate like giant chopsticks.
The Starship spacecraft itself, after completing its mission and reentering Earth’s atmosphere, would flip horizontal, fall back toward Earth in a kind of belly-flop, then right itself, reignite its engines and touch down softly on a landing pad. It’s a technique the company says will allow “missions to destinations across the solar system where runways do not exist.”
Once it’s operational, Musk said, Starship could lower “the cost of access to space by orders of magnitude,” allow people to go to Mars and eventually achieve his goal of making humanity “multi-planetary.”
“We don’t want to be one of those lame one-planet civilizations,” he said.
