My Blog

The ‘devil-you-know’ election | CNN Politics

A version of this story appeared in The Point newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.


Here’s an amazing stat for you: Just 10 incumbents have so far lost their bids for House, Senate and governor in the 2022 general election.

That number includes nine House members – two of whom lost to fellow incumbents – and one governor, Nevada’s Steve Sisolak. (CNN has yet to project a winner in several House races and the Alaska governor’s race, where GOP Gov. Mike Dunleavy is seeking another term.)

To date, not a single senator has lost reelection – although Alaska GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s race has yet to be called and Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock is in a December 6 runoff in Georgia.

In a slide deck seeking to understand what happened in the 2022 election, Republican lobbyist Bruce Mehlman wrote: “Voters sought stability at a time of heightened anxiety.”

Looking at the lay of the land, it’s hard to argue with that.

In the Senate, just a single seat – Pennsylvania – has switched party control so far. On the House side, Republicans could be on their way to a 222-213 majority – which would be the exact same wafer-thin margin that Democrats had in the 117th Congress.

That makes it difficult to conclude that the midterm was, in any meaningful way, a change election.

Which is, at first blush, shocking. After all, the exit polls are littered with data that would suggest the public was ready for change. Consider:

* Three in four midterm voters nationally (76%) said the state of the economy was poor or not good.

* 79% said inflation had caused them either severe or moderate hardship.

* 73% said they were either angry or dissatisfied about the the way things were going in the US.

That certainly looks like an electorate ready to make a major change. But it didn’t. So, what gives?

I suspect that Mehlman’s got the right of it. Call it the ‘devil-you-know’ election. Voters weren’t thrilled with the way things have been going, but didn’t feel strongly enough to throw the bums out.

I also think there was a strain of concern about democracy mixed in there as well. Voters saw how fragile democracy was on January 6, 2021, and were mindful of voting in inexperienced politicians – or people who flat-out branded themselves as election deniers.

The Point: Voters largely chose the status quo in the midterms – even though they were pretty unhappy about the state of affairs in the country. It’s a good reminder that how people vote is rarely determined by a single factor.

Related posts

Democrats to Tackle Problems With New State Power


Blinken says he had ‘frank’ discussion with Russian foreign in minister spoke to Russian foreign minister Lavrov Friday


How the selection of weapons compares to gun deaths in the United States


Leave a Comment