The ruling from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals comes in a case brought by a government watchdog group that is seeking to get the unredacted version of the memo. The DOJ argued some redacted portions should be shielded from public view.
Barr then told Congress he was “consulting” with top DOJ officials on whether there was enough evidence to show Trump committed obstruction. But that was misleading, the courts have found and the Justice Department has since acknowledged.
Barr had already decided the sitting President would not be charged with a crime, Chief Judge Sri Srinavasan of the DC Circuit wrote in the new opinion.
The DC Circuit likened the Trump charging analysis that Barr requested from the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel and others to him asking for a departmental position on whether the late President Richard Nixon broke the law during Watergate — an imaginary request that could be made “because [the attorney general] had simply been curious,” the appeals court wrote.
The court ultimately ruled on the side of the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington after the DOJ tried to argue its redactions were still valid because they protected legal deliberations. Those legal deliberations didn’t exist in this circumstance, the court decided, agreeing with lower court judge Amy Berman Jackson.
