“Sisters, I’m very sorry. We can’t continue the livestreaming tonight because of our internal equipment failure, ” Li said. “You can all go to bed early, please. The products that haven’t been shown will be presented to you in our future livestreaming sessions.”
But Li didn’t show up for two livestreaming events that were scheduled for the following days. Since then, he has disappeared from the online space, suspending all streaming activities without explanation.
His Weibo and WeChat accounts still exist, but haven’t been updated since early June.
The long silence is unusual for Li, who hosted about 250 live streaming sessions last year. Li and his agency did not respond to requests for comment.
He isn’t the only internet star to vanish in China in recent months.
Huang had millions of followers on China’s major social media and shopping platforms — including Weibo, Taobao and TikTok’s China version Douyin — but her accounts were removed in December. She has not appeared online since then.
Known in China as the “live-streaming queen,” the 36-year-old had become one of China’s most popular influencers over the last decade, helping to sell goods worth billions of dollars.
While Li and Viya are missing from the internet, an unlikely candidate has emerged to take their spot in China’s livestreaming world.
Viya and Dong did not respond to requests for comment.
The sudden rise and fall of China’s most famous influencers underscores the vulnerability of those who depend on the internet for their livelihood in the world’s second-largest economy.
While Li and Viya were almost certainly censored by the government, the crackdown on livestreamers is part of a wider Communist Party regulatory effort to enforce greater supervision over private industries, ranging from tech to real estate.
Since coming to power in 2012, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has called for the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” A tighter control over all aspects of society -— business, education, entertainment, and culture — is central to this vision.
“One thing that the Chinese government has demonstrated numerous times over the last several years is that nobody is too important economically, culturally, politically, etc. to be censored, fined, banned, or in the worst case, completely disappeared,” said Cara Wallis, an associate professor at Texas A&M University who studies China’s media industry and online culture.
“This fact, combined with broader geopolitical uncertainty, does make it appear that it is more risky to do business in China right now,” she said.
‘Innocent mistake’
Xi’s government hasn’t shown much tolerance for controversial political statements, no matter who makes them or what the intent of the statement was. So it’s not much of a surprise Li’s tank-shaped ice cream hit a nerve.
The crackdown, which killed hundreds, if not thousands, of unarmed protesters, is shunned in classrooms and strictly censored in media. It is unlikely that people born in mainland China after the incident have much knowledge about it.
Wallis said that Li hasn’t ever been overtly political, and he wouldn’t have had anything to gain by trying to make a political statement.
“Regarding Li Jiaqi, I really do think it was an innocent mistake,” Wallis added. “And, as many have pointed out, most of his fans would probably not even realize any connection between the shape of the ice cream cake and June 4th.”
But the swift ban on him indicates how sensitive Chinese censors might be in this environment, she said.
Rongbin Han, an associate professor at University of Georgia focusing on China’s internet and media politics, also believes Li might have made an “inadvertent” mistake. But the Tiananmen incident topic is a clear taboo in China and the timing is “fatal,” he added.
The fact that Li’s livestreaming was immediately interrupted indicates “the progress the Chinese state has made in the realm of censorship,” Han said. “Clearly, it is going beyond simply keyword filtering.”
“In general, we do see rising level of uncertainty regarding keeping up to political taboos and red lines,” he added.
Intensifying crackdown
Two weeks after Li’s show was cut off, the National Radio and Television Administration — a top media regulator — and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism jointly released new rules banning 31 “misbehaviors” by livestreaming hosts.
Hosts must “uphold correct political values and social values,” according to the rules. They should also self-regulate and avoid “illegal and harmful” content during the show, and must not publish anything that “undermines the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party. “
Those who seriously violate the rules will be put on a blacklist and permanently banned from the business, the regulation said.
The new regulation is a latest move by Beijing to intensify its crackdown on the the country’s booming livestreaming industry.
“There probably is a need for some regulation of livestreamers whose content falls within the ‘professional’ areas mentioned in one section of the regulations,” Wallis said, referring to one of the rules that requires livestreamers to have the right qualifications when talking about topics, such as law, finance, medicine, and education.
“But the overall emphasis on harmony, promoting socialist values, correct outlook, etc. throughout the new code of conduct really speaks to tightening ideological control,” she said.
David Craig, a communications professor at University of Southern California, said it’s always been difficult to do business in China, especially as firms and executives grow too powerful economically and culturally, “which the state finds threatening.”
But he noted the timing might be a factor for China’s intensifying control.
“Every five years, these waves of dramatic and exaggerated governance appear right before the [Communist Party congress,]” he said, adding that the dramatic crackdown tends to go away or reduce in severity afterward.
Worsening outlook
A strict crackdown on the ballooning live-streaming industry might not be a good news for China’s economy. According to iResearch Consulting Group, the size of China’s livestreaming e-commerce market hit 1.2 trillion yuan ($178 billion) in 2020, up 197% from the previous year. The consulting firm expected it to grow to 4.9 trillion yuan ($726 billion) by 2023 with the same growth rate.
But that was before the world’s second-largest economy began slowing down.
“The fact that a social media influencer who is not politically motivated may inadvertently become a censorship target clearly sends a signal with chilling effects,” Han said.
“In this regard, it may have adverse effects on the government’s plan to boost the economy,” he said.
The intensifying crackdown against top live-streamers come as the e-commerce industry shows signs of slower growth amid regulatory tightening and economic slowdown.
CNN’s Nectar Gan contributed to this report.
