Hamilton has been informed to take them out via the Monaco Grand Prix on Would possibly 29 however has stated he has no purpose of doing so.
“This can be a rule for the fitting causes,” former Benetton, McLaren and Williams driving force Wurz, who’s closely interested by driving force protection and training, informed Reuters.
“I might have almost definitely favored a fairly other way of learn how to ship the message.
“I do not wish to finally end up in soccer the place there are extra fingers within the air and verbal abuse…you need to paintings in combination. It is a taste I might have most well-liked on this case.”
The ban on jewellery, in addition to the dressed in of non-compliant under-garments, has lengthy been within the regulations however hardly enforced till the FIA clamped down this season.
It says pieces underneath the necessary flameproof clothes may build up the danger of burn accidents and has highlighted the danger of important delays or headaches if clinical imaging is needed following an twist of fate.
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem informed the Day-to-day Mail ultimate week he sought after Hamilton to ship the fitting message to younger drivers as a task fashion.
Wurz stated he had by no means forgotten a chat he attended as an adolescent given via Danish former racer Kris Nissen, who had a fiery sportscar crash at Japan’s Fuji circuit in 1988.
“He confirmed his frame and stated ‘have a look at this’,” recalled the 48-year-old.
“For him absolutely the maximum painful factor after hearth, and it wasn’t a protracted hearth, was once the rubber (elastic) in his customary pants being burnt into the outside. He stated (it was once) for years agony and ache. And it skilled me.
“At this second I stated I do not wish to are living those penalties, just for (no longer) taking my pants off and hanging fireproof underpants on. The similar with jewellery.”
Miami recommendation
Wurz stated the GPDA was once speaking to the FIA concerning the frame’s refusal in Miami to protect a concrete wall with an energy-absorbing Tecpro barrier after Alpine’s Esteban Ocon and Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz crashed closely.
A number of drivers accused the FIA of ignoring their considerations, even though the frame stated it had listened to their recommendation however made up our minds no adjustments have been wanted.
Wurz stated hitting a concrete wall, even in a 2d equipment nook, was once going to harm.
A Tecpro barrier may virtually halve the G forces, he added, and imply a driving force would no longer want clinical exams and the chassis and gearbox would stay intact.
That will lower your expenses, with groups matter to finances caps, and take away the wish to fly a broken chassis again to Europe, including to the carbon footprint.
Wurz stated the GPDA have been informed a barrier was once to be had and will have been put in.
“Strictly talking we did not have an harm, so perhaps you’ll be able to say it (the barrier) isn’t essential however we wish to say that if we had it, it might beef up the location,” he added.
“No analysis on the earth can inform me it might were a problem to place it (there).”
