The textual content of the invoice defines 9 “divisive ideas” that will now not be allowed to study if it turns into legislation. Amongst them are the tips that one race or ethnicity is inherently awesome to any other; the idea that that the USA and Georgia are “basically or systemically racist”; and the follow of academics making scholars really feel demeaned or to blame on account of their races, pores and skin colours or ethnicities.
Whilst the invoice would ban those ideas in curriculums and coaching systems, the language within the invoice does now not “limit the dialogue of divisive ideas, as a part of a bigger process instruction, in an function way and with out endorsement.”
Consistent with the textual content of the invoice, it additionally does now not “limit using curriculum that addresses subjects of slavery, racial or ethnic oppression, racial or ethnic segregation, or racial or ethnic discrimination, together with subjects with regards to the enactment and enforcement of rules leading to such oppression, segregation, and discrimination.”
