Postmaster Normal Louis DeJoy reiterated that the Postal Carrier these days does not have the investment to be had to extend the collection of electrical automobiles in its fleet.
In a letter despatched previous this month, EPA affiliate administrator Vicki Arroyo mentioned the USPS plan used to be “inconsistent” with clean-energy insurance policies at state, federal and world ranges, and known as it a “an important misplaced alternative to extra abruptly cut back the carbon footprint of one of the crucial greatest govt fleets on this planet.”
Brenda Mallory, chair of the White Area Council of Environmental High quality, penned a separate letter urging USPS to make stronger its environmental assessment according to the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act and including that the company may just face repercussions from Congress or the courts if it failed to take action.
In spite of their objections, the EPA and the White Area cannot prevent the USPS plan from taking place; the USPS is an unbiased company liable for investment itself.
In a remark, Mark Guilfoil, vp for provide control at USPS, mentioned the company “decided that EPA’s request for a supplemental [environmental impact statement] and public listening to would no longer upload worth to the Postal Carrier’s already year-long assessment,” including that neither had been legally required.
USPS mentioned it’s going to depart some flexibility to extend the collection of EVs within the fleet “as monetary sources turn out to be to be had.”
Adrian Martinez, a senior lawyer on the environmental regulation workforce Earthjustice, mentioned environmental teams would pursue litigation to get USPS to opposite route.
“DeJoy’s environmental assessment is rickety, based on suspect calculations, and fails to fulfill the criteria of the regulation,” Martinez mentioned. “We are not accomplished combating this reckless choice.”
